case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of your boy or Female do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Also, it may review an appeal of the decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts if the Commission cannot achieve a decision.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion will involve a transfer into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, over the other hand, supplies financial relief by placing an employee within a higher pay out scale, without transforming their work duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained within the same fork out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they deficiency possibilities for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Device used to ease the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh read more and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or Woman will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they will cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that although taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the merit of the many suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of your respondent department.
Are you currently looking for Court Information? You should utilize our site to search for a case or search for any person. Information over the site is updated every 24 hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found over the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
Doing a case legislation search could possibly be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, such as:
ten. Based around the findings of your inquiry committee, this petition is just not regarded as maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case legislation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may materialize several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first from the High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his development with the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more